Operation Jubilee: The Disaster at Dieppe – Part 1: 19 August 1942

Introduction
Hitting Back
Planning Begins
From the Ashes
The Allied Plan: Operation Jubilee
The German Plan
The Forces I: Allied
The Forces II: German
Bibliography and Further Reading
On-line Resources

Introduction

Map of the English Channel Map of Dieppe
Calgary Tank Allied Dead at Dieppe The Dieppe Beach Wrecks on the Beach Commandos at Dieppe Dieppe Defences Cameron Highlanders at Dieppe Dieppe Ships Varengeville Wreckage at Dieppe Puys Returning from Dieppe Prisoners of War Prisoners of War
By the summer of 1942, the UK had started to conduct a rigorous programme of raids on the northwest boundary of the Nazi Empire. From St Nazaire to Norway, the Armed Forces of the UK and the Commonwealth, and in particular the Commandos, took the fight back to the Germans, tying down garrison forces, boosting morale at home and engendering an offensive spirit in the Armed Forces as a whole. Despite this, the overall situation for the Allies was grim. Japan had conducted a well planned and executed lightning offensive across Asia and the Pacific and after occupying Burma was threatening India, Australia and the Eastern Pacific. The Germans was driving the Eighth Army before them in North Africa, were driving on the Caucasus and the Volga, menacing Stalingrad and had U-Boats rampaging around the Atlantic. While there was hope now that the United States had entered the war, it would be unable to start making an impact until her Armed Forces had fully mobilised.

Hitting Back

The United States and the Soviet Union, as well as public opinion urged the UK to open a second front to relieve the Eastern Front and discourage further German expansion in the East. Unfortunately at this point, the UK did not have the means available to conduct and sustain large-scale offensive operations in North West Europe as it was already heavily engaged in North Africa, the Middle East and the Far East. The divisions that had been recently mobilised lacked the equipment and expertise to mount a full-scale conventional offensive on the continent, as well as the amphibious operations to get over there in the first place – a great deal of planning, development and training had to be undertaken before that could happen, especially in terms of combined operations between the army, air force and navy. Despite this, Britain could hit back through its programme of raiding, which helped to tie down enemy forces that would otherwise be available for use against the Soviets. Although substantial, these forces would never approach those already committed on the Eastern Front (forty-six divisions as against well in-excess of 200), which was the main focus for Nazi Germany.

The organisation that planned and executed attacks against mainland Europe was known as Combined Operations, and was not a service in its own right but had to rely on the cooperation of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force (the cooperation of the Army had been secured as it already had a force of Army Commandos with which to operate) to provide the means by which it carried out its attacks. The head of Combined Operations, Lord Louis Mountbatten, joined the Chiefs of Staff Committee in March 1942, which put Combined Operations on a par (theoretically) with the other services. Churchill, under pressure from the Allies and public opinion, suggested large-scale landings in Norway or the Cherbourg Peninsula. These were considered by the Chiefs of Staff to be impractical, but they did suggest a large-scale raid against a port somewhere along the Pas de Calais coastline, within the protective umbrella of Fighter Command. Seven such ports were examined and rejected, but the next along the coastline, Dieppe, was accepted as it was just seventy miles from Newhaven (close enough to allow a surprise attack with the force approaching under the cover of darkness) and still well within range of Fighter Command’s aircraft. On 4 April 1942, Mountbatten gave the order for his staff to draw up plans.

Planning Begins

Two variants were drawn up by Mountbatten’s staff and presented to the Chiefs of Staff. These were:
  1. To land tanks and infantry either side of Dieppe and capturing the town with a pincer movement over the two headlands on each flank of the port.
  2. To land tanks and infantry directly on the town’s beach in a frontal assault and have supporting landings both east and west of the town. The two heavy gun batteries that commanded the approaches to Dieppe (located at Varengeville and Berneval) would be seized by airborne troops landing ahead of the main attack.
Both variants envisaged a ‘reconnaissance in force’ rather than just a raid to gain experience of large-scale amphibious landings and to test if the Allies were able to land and maintain forces ashore after an amphibious assault. On 18 April 1942 the Committee decided that further planning should commence on the second variant, with the main frontal assault being preceded by a heavy aerial bombardment. The operation was given the codename ‘Rutter’ and planned to take place during early July when the tides were right.

The size and scale of the operation made it too large for Army Commandos to carry out by themselves so regular troops from the Home Forces would be involved, most likely coming from Lieutenant General Bernard Montgomery’s South Eastern Command. It was decided that Canadian troops, already located in the south-east since the beginning of the war, would be used, although Montgomery later claimed that the final decision to use them came not from him, but from his superior, General Sir Bernard Paget. By 1942 there were over 200,000 of them, organised into three infantry and two armoured divisions, several armoured brigades and artillery formations. The Canadians were an all-volunteer force and so were keen to see action, three years having trained and performing garrison duties leading to morale problems. Their commander, Lt Gen R G L McNaughton (who was to eventually command the Canadian First Army) was asked to provide troops for the operations and selected the Canadian 2nd Infantry Division (commanded at the time by Major General John H Roberts) to supply the necessary manpower. In fact, as the operation was to be larger than anything previously attempted, all three services would be contributing significant forces to it. There would be over 6,000 troops landing with the Royal Navy having the responsibility of transporting the troops to their objective, landing them, then embarking them again to return to the UK, as well as supplying supporting gunfire to neutralise enemy installations. The RAF would protect the operation from the unwelcome attention of the Luftwaffe by fielding the largest fighter screen since the Battle of Britain.

By 9 May, the main elements of the plan had coalesced and taken shape and so the outline was put in front of the Chiefs of Staff Committee and adopted. Intelligence indicated that Dieppe was not particularly heavily defended and that the beaches in the vicinity were suitable for the landing of infantry and tanks. While there were some misgivings about adopting this variant, most notably from Mountbatten, featuring as it did a direct frontal assault on the most heavily defended part of the Dieppe beachfront, most were optimistic about its chances.

Operation Rutter was planned to take place between the 4 and 8 July. After weeks of training and preparation the troops embarked on their craft but the order to sail was not given as the period of time when the tides were most suitable coincided with a bout of very unsettled weather. On top of this, the Germans spotted the convoy gathered in the Solent and bombed them. While very little damage was done, it was possible that the enemy would now be alerted to the fact that some sort of amphibious operation was about to be undertaken. This, coupled with the weather getting even worse, forced the operation’s cancellation.

From the Ashes

While most believed that this would mean an end to the operation, Mountbatten and his staff had other ideas. Many operations of this sort had been cancelled and they thought that this plan was good enough to warrant another go. Mountbatten lobbied Churchill and the Chiefs of Staff and eventually received the go-ahead to try again, despite there being grave concerns over security. By now, it was common knowledge to too many people that Dieppe had been the target of Operation Rutter and the desire to see the attack go ahead was overriding caution and common sense. By this time, Montgomery had left South Eastern Command to take over the Eighth Army in North Africa but as he left, voiced disapproval that the same target was to be attacked in the new plan and in a letter to his superior, General Paget, urged that a new target be chosen because of the possibility of a breach of security. However, the go-ahead had come from the very top and so Mountbatten’s staff resumed work on a new outline plan, given the codename ‘Jubilee’, now to take place during mid-August. Montgomery’s responsibilities were passed to the new commander of the Canadian I Corps, Lieutenant General Harry Crerar who saw the plan through to execution.

The Allied Plan: Operation Jubilee

The raid on Dieppe had many objectives, the first and foremost being that it came from political pressures to demonstrate that the Western Allies could make a contribution to the Allied war effort and take the fight to Nazi Germany. It would also enable the Canadian troops to gain battle experience and show that they could make a vital contribution to the Allied effort, which would be good for both the troops’ morale and the public morale back in Canada. The raid would also be something of a test to see if the various branches of the Armed Services, indeed, the different nationalities, could work together with a degree of harmony in order to bring off a combined arms operation of this magnitude. Could army, air force and naval assets be brought together, transport a force, land it, protect it and retrieve it again after it had completed its objectives? It might also be a chance for the RAF to bring the Luftwaffe to battle and inflict a defeat on it over the skies of Dieppe. What happened here would shape the future direction and decisions (tactical, operational and strategic) regarding the planning for the opening of the second front.

The plan for Operation Jubillee was very similar to that for Operation Rutter, but did differ in a number of aspects, principally in the use of commandos instead of airborne troops. The Allied forces (under Military Force Commander, Major General John H Roberts) would land on seven separate beaches and then form a single lodgement on the coast:

The port of Dieppe sits across the estuary of the River Arques, which had created a small valley less than a mile wide at its mouth. The terrain around the estuary consisted of high chalk cliffs on either side while a single steep shingle-covered beach forms the beachfront at Dieppe itself. The landings would take place on these at dawn (civil twilight with the sun 6 degrees below the horizon) with the main body of tanks and infantry forming up and striking inland. The Commandos would attack first at 04.50 hrs (nautical twilight with the sun being 12 degrees below the horizon but enough faint light to discern landmarks). Engineer and demolitions parties would destroy vital installations such as the dockyard facilities, the telephone exchange, railway lines, marshalling yards, tunnels, the gas works and the power station, while other groups would seek to get hold of enemy plans, documents and communications equipment. The radar site near Pourville was especially important and a number of special groups were instructed about not only how to demolish it, but also to keep an eye out for specialised equipment. The Royal Marines that were landing with the main force on the Dieppe beachfront would capture and remove any invasion barges or other craft that were in the harbour. Beach defences were to be inspected, tactical layouts examined, deployments evaluated and counter moves (if any) recorded. There were great lessons to be learned here and the raid was much more than just a matter of inflicting casualties upon the Germans.

The majority of vessels available to Captain John Hughes-Hallett (Naval Force Commander) were light ones or landing craft. The only real firepower to protect the ships of the fleet and bombard the enemy shore came from the 4in guns of the eight destroyers and one gunboat. The remaining weapons ranged from the 3in guns of the steam gunboats to the 40mm and 20mm guns of the support vessels. The lack of firepower would be a crucial mistake, as even the 4in guns could do little damage to heavily protected enemy gun emplacements, pillboxes and bunkers and only serve to keep the gunners heads down. Moutbatten had asked for a battleship to accompany the raid to engage targets that were on the shore with enough firepower to do some damage but be accurate enough to stand a chance of not obliterating the entire town. The Navy Chiefs, terrified of loosing a capital ship to German air power, swiftly rejected the idea and it was decided to leave the task of shattering the German defence to the RAF.

Another difference between Jubilee and Rutter was that Hughes-Hallett decided that as the troops were already trained and dispersed, the seaborne operation would proceed differently. He wanted to avoid the possibility of the force be detected and attacked by German aircraft and so the ships could remain dispersed and the troops concentrate at the nearest ports of embarkation and sail the evening they boarded. The troops could also move to Dieppe directly in their assault craft, avoiding the need for them to be transferred from landing ship to assault craft. Jubilee would be launched from a variety of south coast ports, including Newhaven, Gosport, Portsmouth, Shoreham and Southampton and each flotilla's departure would be timed so the fleet would arrive off the coast at Dieppe at the correct moment. Most would be leaving in darkness, but the ships from Southampton would have to leave while it was still daylight because of the longer journey and so would be disguised as a coastal convoy to avoid detection.

The two main objectives for the RAF during Jubilee were to firstly, provide air cover for the assault and secondly attack the enemy's defensive capability. The size of the landings however meant that Air Vice Marshal T. Leigh-Mallory could contemplate a third objective. He intended to literally and metaphorically throw the 'gauntlet' down to the Luftwaffe and entice it into battle. It was likely that as the landings developed, the Germans might view this as a prelude to a full-scale invasion and react accordingly. The RAF therefore had some sixty-eight squadrons available, more than that available to Air Chief Marshal Dowding at any time in the Battle of Britain. The RAF intended to take on the Luftwaffe over Dieppe and defeat it. However, as the planning proceeded, one of the first things that were abandoned was the great nighttime bombing raid over Dieppe. Leigh-Mallory felt it was not the best way in which to use bombers and that such a raid would put the enemy on alert. The Military Force Commander also felt that such a bombardment would create a great deal of rubble that would clog the streets and hinder the progress of the tanks. As an alternative, Leigh-Mallory proposed that diversionary attacks be made on German airfields in northern France, cannon-firing aircraft would strafe the German beach defences and Hurricane fighter-bombers would attack individual targets with 250lbs bombs. As the plan that was to be implemented slowly slipped from that originally envisaged, the great pre-assault bombardment by the RAF's heavy bombers and the Navy's battleship became further and further diluted until it was reduced to fighter-bomber raids and strafing attacks by Hurricanes and light selected gunfire by destroyers and a gunboat. The ground forces assaulting Dieppe would pay the price.

The German Plan

At the time of the assault, Dieppe had been in German hands a little over two years and enemy had every intention of defending it against attack. The area was the responsibility of the 302nd Infantry Division who had worked hard to create a strong set of defences, which were naturally concentrated on those areas where the high chalk cliffs dipped into the sea enough to allow points of disembarkation. The beach exits were blocked by wire and bordered by two sets of barbed wire entanglements, one on the shingle and one on the low sea wall. Where the exits ended in steep gullies, concrete walls, wire and booby traps blocked these. Concrete pillboxes covered the shoreline and around Dieppe itself ran a perimeter of wire, roadblocks and pillboxes, within which were three field batteries of 4in or 5.9in guns. Eight 75mm guns were on the headlands overlooking the town and concrete walls and more gun positions blocked the streets leading inland from the beach. Machineguns and light antiaircraft weapons were positioned along the esplanade and headlands, while there were pillboxes at either end of the seafront. A large derelict building, formerly the Casino and reinforced to become a defensive position held more weapons overlooking the main landing beaches. A naval unit equipped with eight 37mm guns and two heavy Antiaircraft batteries also augmented the defensive firepower.

On the extreme flanks, the large coastal guns of the Hess and Goebbels batteries covered the sea approaches with their ten 150mm guns. These weapons were in fact the responsibility of the Kriegsmarine and were manned by naval personnel. They were sited well outside the Dieppe defence zone and the 302nd was just too stretched to provide the necessary infantry to protect them. While there had been some disagreements between the Army and Navy about the exposed position of the guns and their vulnerability, a compromise had been reached but no action had been taken by the time of the raid. The town itself was the responsibility of Oberstleutnant (Lt Col) Hermann Bartelt's 571st Infantry Regiment. His headquarters was in the Château overlooking the main beach in Dieppe but he had just two depleted battalions totalling some 1,500 men to cover Varengeville in the west, to Berneval in the east. Just 50 men guarded the beach at Puys and 150 men at Dieppe. While the initial defence was thinly held, such defensive emplacements still presented a formidable obstacle to any assault force and the Germans, knowing this, had planned around it – Haase held half his men back in reserve and had Corps (four rifle battalions at Dunclair) and Army (10th Panzer Division at Amiens) reserves within fifty miles.

The Forces I: Allied

For the majority of World War Two, the Canadian Army in Europe was an all-volunteer formation and so the Canadian troops used in Operation Jubilee had not been subjected to conscription. On 1 September 1939, the Canadian Department of National Defence issued a general order authorising the setting up of what was called a ‘Canadian Active Service Force’ with two divisions plus ancillary troops being raised, mainly from existing reserve forces. Many of these included famous regiments that had not only long histories but also a substantial number of battle honours between them. The standing army was also enlarged by the mobilisation of volunteers – no compulsory / national service legislation was introduced at that time. The first units from the Active Service Force (Canadian 1st Infantry Division) landed in the UK on 17 December 1939 with the 2nd Infantry Division arriving in 1940 and further divisions being raised that would be committed to service overseas. With the fall of France in June 1940, the Canadian Government saw that its commitment to the Allied cause would have to be expanded massively, a commitment that would not be fulfilled by a reliance on volunteers. In the summer of 1940, the National Resources Mobilisation Act was passed that conscripted all men between the ages of 21 and 45. There was however, no obligation for these men to serve overseas. The act was amended in mid-1942 but was not invoked until November 1944 with the first conscripts arriving in Europe in January 1945. By the end of World War Two, only 12,908 conscripts had been sent overseas out of a total commitment to Europe of 368,000 meaning that the Canadians had maintained a 96.5 percent all-volunteer force during the war.

The Canadian 2nd Infantry Division arrived in the UK under the command of Major General V W Odlum in the late summer of 1940. Three battalions (The Royal Regiment of Canada, Les Fusiliers Mont-Royal and the Cameron Highlanders of Ottawa) were diverted to reinforce the garrison on Iceland, an important base that sat astride the Atlantic sea-lanes from North America. The UK wanted the whole of the division to be posted there, but the Canadian Government considered that public opinion would be against the use of Canadian forces as permanent garrisons abroad. The British eventually agreed, and the Icelandic garrison was taken over by the 49th (West Riding) Division.

The organisation, training and equipment of the Canadian Army was broadly similar to that of the British Army, with the Canadian 2nd Infantry Division consisting of three brigades, each of three battalions, a machinegun battalion, three regiments of field artillery and supporting services. The brigades were the 4th, 5th and 6th and consisted of the Royal Regiment of Canada, Royal Hamilton Light Infantry, Essex Scottish Regiment (in the 4th), Black Watch of Canada, Le Régiment de Maisonneuvre, the Calgary Highlanders (in the 5th), Les Fusiliers Mont-Royal, the Queen’s Own Cameron Highlanders of Canada and the South Saskatchewan Regiment (in the 6th). Support was provided by the Cameron Highlanders of Ottawa (the machinegun battalion) and the 4th, 5th and 6th Royal Canadian Artillery Field Regiments, along with the 8th Reconnaissance Regiment (14th Canadian Hussars). Maj Gen Odlum was replaced by Maj Gen John H Roberts in late 1941 and brought a new impetus to both training and performance – something that, along with morale, had been in steady decline due to the long period of relative inactivity in the UK. Roberts replaced many of the older officers in the division by moving them to other jobs and the younger officers that replaced them boosted the men’s morale. He began a series of exercises and training programmes that the men could channel their excess energy into.

On 8 May 1942 came news that the division would at last be involved in a specific operation. Roberts selected the six battalions making up the 4th and 6th Brigades and training began in earnest on the Isle of Wight on 20 May. The Isle of Wight was perfect for such training as it was isolated from the mainland, which helped security and had a large number of beaches that could be used in the training of amphibious operations and a number of high chalk cliffs, similar to those either side of Dieppe. As training began in earnest, it was apparent that not only the physical fitness of the troops had to be improved but their combat training as well, and so the Isle of Wight was sealed once all the constituent components of the operations had assembled. As the date for Operation Rutter approached the division prepared itself for action. Rutter however was cancelled and the troops were dispersed back across South East England, not knowing that in a few short weeks they would in fact see action under the guise of Operation Jubilee.

The objectives and target of the plan remained unchanged; the only major difference being that instead of using airborne troops to capture the large German coastal batteries, they would be seized by seaborne assault using No. 3 Commando to assault the Goebbels Battery at Berneval and No. 4 Commando to attack the Hess Battery at Varengeville. The first Commandos had been formed in the summer of 1940 with the majority of their number coming from the Independent Companies that had been formed to act as guerrillas in the event of invasion or to act as ship-board raiding parties and land behind enemy lines. The new Commandos were much larger than the Independent Companies (twenty officers and 270 men) with twenty-four officers and 435 men and were organised into a headquarters and five fighting Troops (each of three officers and sixty men) along with support and communications services. Their main task was to take the fight back to the enemy and attack installations, provide reconnaissance and flank protection to major operations. They were highly trained, specialised infantry who were lightly armed and had flexibility of organisation.

No. 3 Commando had been raised in July 1940 under Lt Col J F Durnford-Slater and was involved in such raids as those on Guernsey, the Lofoten islands and Vaagsö, while No. 4 Commando, under Lt Col The Lord Lovat, had been established at about the same time and participated in the Lofoten Raid as well as providing manpower for other raids, such as St Nazaire. No. 3 moved from Scotland to Seaford in Sussex, while No. 4 moved down to Weymouth. Both Commandos started intense planning on how to take the batteries as well as training and exercising so that not only did the men's fitness improve but men were crossed training to several other tasks so that in the event of casualties, the critical tasks could still be carried out. No. 4 practised their assault in Lulworth Cove while No. 3 trained coming ashore on the chalk cliffs of the Sussex Downs. As the raid approached, both Commandos were fully trained and raring to go. As it happened, a group of American officers were attached to the Combined Operations HQ at the time, hoping to get experience of commando techniques. The senior officer was Brigadier General Lucian Truscott who had recently formed the first modern American Commandos, the Rangers (whose lineage as it happened, went way back to the American War of Independence). Truscott had raised the US 1st Ranger Battalion in June 1942 along the same lines as the British Commandos and performed the same training at the Commando Basic Training Centre near Achnacarry in Scotland. Mountbatten asked Truscott if he would like some rangers to accompany the mission in order to giv them some experience and insight to battle conditions. Trusott readily agreed and some six officers and forty-four men were selected to accompany the Allied force.

The Order of Battle for Operation Jubilee thus comprised:

1. Army Forces (under the command of Major General John H Roberts):

2. Naval Forces (under the command of Capt John Hughes-Hallett)

Destroyers: HMS Calpe (HQ ship); HMS Fernie; HMS Brocklesby; HMS Garth; HMS Albrighton; HMS Berkeley; HMS Bleasdale; and ORP Slazak.

Sloop and Gunboat: HMS Alresford and HMS Locust.

9th and 13th Minesweeper Flotillas

Landing Ships: HMS Glengyle (LSI Large); HMS Queen Emma (LSI Medium); HMS Princess Beatrix (LSI Medium); HMS Prince Charles (LSI Small); HMS Prince Albert (LSI Small); HMS Prince Leopold (LSI Small); HMS Princess Astrid (LSI Small); HMS Invicta (LSI Small); and HMS Duke of Wellington (LSI Small).

Escorting Craft: Motor Gun Boats (MGB) Nos. 50, 51, 52, 57, 312, 315, 316, 317, 320, 321, 323 & 326; Steam Gun Boats (SGB) Nos. 5, 6, 8 & 9; Motor Launches (ML) Nos. 114, 120, 123, 171, 187, 189, 190, 191, 193, 194, 208, 214, 230, 246, 291, 292, 309, 343, 344 & 346; Free French Chasseurs Nos. 5, 10, 13, 14, 41, 42 & 43.

3. Air Forces (under the command of Air Vice Marshall Trafford Leigh-Mallory)

RAF Fighter Command No. 11 Group

Spitfire Squadrons: 19, 41, 64, 65, 66, 71, 81, 91, 111, 118, 121, 124, 129, 130, 131, 133, 154, 165, 222, 232, 242, 302, 303, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 312, 317, 331, 332, 340, 350, 401, 402, 403, 411, 412, 416, 485, 501, 602, 610, 611 & 616.

Hurricane Squadrons: 3, 32, 43, 87, 174, 175, 245 & 253.

Typhoon Squadrons: 56, 266 & 609.

Boston Squadrons: 88, 107, 226, 418 & 605.

Blenheim Squadrons: 13 & 614.

Mustang Squadrons: 26, 239, 400 & 414.

Beaufighter Squadron: 141.

USAAF 97th Bombardment Group

B-17 Squadrons: 340th, 341st, 342nd & 414th.

The Forces II: German

By 1942, the bulk of the German Armed Forces were serving on the Eastern Front, fighting the Red Army. After the occupation of France and the Low Countries, as well as the eviction of the British Expeditionary Force from Continental Europe in 1940, the role of the German forces in the West became one of occupation and defence, so the formations posted there were gradually replaced over time by reserve and static defence units as the regular and elite formations were sent east. Defending the 50 miles either side of Dieppe, as well as the town and countryside around it was the 302nd Infantry Division, under Gen Lt Konrad Haase. The division was a mobilisation division, formed in December 1940 and one of nine new divisions created during Mobilisation Wave 13, tasked with occupation duties in Western Europe. The division was from Wehrkreis II, the military district with its headquarters in Stettin, northern Germany, with its personnel coming from the surrounding areas of Mecklenburg and Pomerania. The division comprised the 570th, 571st and 572nd Infantry Regiments, each of two battalions, along with the 302nd Artillery Regiment, 302nd Reconnaissance Battalion, 302nd Antitank Battalion, 302nd Engineer Battalion and 302nd Signal Battalion.

The division arrived in the area of Dieppe in April 1941 after spending a short time doing garrison duty in Germany. It soon settled into occupation duties and Haase organised the division to police the local population and to defend the locality – at the time it was at full strength and fully manned. The situation did not long remain stable however. The flow of new recruits from the training schools in Germany did not meet the needs of the campaign in the east, which seemed to devour men and material with a voracious appetite and so both personnel and equipment was gradually taken from established formations in the field. Little by little, the German national composition of the 302nd was gradually diluted with foreign conscripts, many of which varied in the enthusiasm as to serving the Third Reich. Much of the modern weaponry was replaced by older, pre-war or captured equipment (even some British!) leading to a strain on the logistics system, as spare parts and ammunition were increasingly harder to come by. Most of the transport was horse-drawn, with bicycles and French trucks also commandeered. However, static troops that concentrate on a defensive task (not excluding local and limited counterattacks) do not necessarily need the latest equipment in formidable concrete emplacements and defensive positions and obsolescent machineguns, even second-rate troops can give a good account of themselves.

Bibliography and Further Reading

Books and Monographs
Atkin, Ronald, Dieppe 1942 – The Jubilee Disaster , Macmillan, London, 1980
cover cover cover

Campbell, John, Dieppe Revisited , Frank Cass & Co, London, 1993.
cover cover cover

Ford, Ken., Dieppe 1942 , Osprey Publishing, Oxford, 2003, Campaign No. 127.
cover cover cover

Garrett, R., The Raiders, , David & Charles, London, 1980.
cover cover cover

Great Battles of World War II, Hogg, Ian, Blandford Press, Poole, 1987
cover cover cover

Mordal, Jacques., Dieppe – The Dawn of Decision , Panther Books, London, 1969.
cover cover cover

Robertson, Terrance, Dieppe: The Shame and the Glory , Hutchinson & Co, London, 1963.
cover cover cover

Thompson, R W., Dieppe at Dawn: The Story of the Dieppe Raid , Hutchinson & Co, London, 1956.
cover cover

Whitaker, Brig Gen Denis & Whitaker, Shelagh., Dieppe: Tragedy to Triumph , McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Whitby, Ontario, 1992.
cover cover cover

Other Reading

Amphibious Warfare Headquarters. History of the Combined Operations Organisation 1940 – 1945, C52794, London, November 1956.
Moore, Lt Col W R. What contemporary lessons may be drawn from Operation JUBILEE, the amphibious assault of Dieppe on August 19, 1942, Defence Research Paper, JSCSC, Watchfield, 1999.
Reyburn, Wallace. Rehearsal for Invasion, Harrap & Co, London, 1943.
Scott, Major S J. To what extent was the raid in Dieppe on 19 August, 1942 an operational and tactical failure but a strategic success, No. 4 DTC MA (Military Studies) Dissertation, July 2001, Cranfield University, RMCS Shrivenham.
Villa, Brian L. Unauthorised Action: Mountbatten and the Dieppe Raid 1942, Oxford University Press, Toronto, 1989.

Articles and Chapters

Berges, Charles. ‘Dieppe’ in The Quarterly Journal of Military History, Spring 1992, Volume 4, Number 3, pp. 100 – 111.
Burrer, Douglas & Linton, Dennis. ‘Juno Beach: The Canadians Avenge Dieppe’ in Military Review, June 1994, pp. 70 – 74.
Campbell, John. ‘Dieppe, Deception and D-Day’ in Canadian Defence Quarterly, Winter 1980, pp. 40 – 44.
Campbell, John. ‘The “Ultra" Revelations: The Dieppe Raid in a New Light’ in Canadian Defence Quarterly, Summer 1976, pp. 36 – 42.
Fanshaw, R J. ‘Dieppe: Unforgettable Lessons’ in Marine Corps Gazette, February 1993, pp. 57 – 59.
Henshaw, Peter. ‘The British Chiefs of Staff Committee and the Preparation of the Dieppe Raid, March – August 1942:Did Mountbatten Really Evade the Committee’s Authority?’ in War in History, Volume 1, Number 2, pp. 197 – 214.
McCulloch, Ian. ‘Prelude to D-Day, Dieppe 1942’ in Osprey Military Journal, Volume 3, Number 1, pp. 44 – 55.
Schriner Jr., Lt Col. C W. ‘The Dieppe Raid, 1942’ in Bartlett, M. Assault from the Sea, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, 1983.

Online Resources

The Raid on Dieppe - Operation Jubilee,active as of 17 November 2003
National Archives of Canada Website Exhibition: 'Through a Lens: Dieppe in Photography and Film', active as of 17 November 2003
Warships1 Website contains a reproduction of a set of reports (Allied and German) regarding Dieppe with notes and annotations by the contributor. The site was active as of 17 November 2003 and the pages were located at: Battle Summary - Naval Operations (Allied)
Allied Summary (continued)
Extracts from German report on the Dieppe Raid
German report (continued)
Operation Jubilee: The Deadly Raid on Dieppe - 19th August 1942 active as of 17 November 2003.
The Raid on Dieppe: August 19, 1942 active as of 17 November 2003
Battle of Dieppe: August 19th, 1942active as of 17 November 2003
Operation Jubilee – Dieppe – Aug 19 1942active as of 17 November 2003
Photos courtesy of 'Battle of Dieppe: August 19th, 1942' Webpage, 'The Raid on Dieppe: August 19, 1942' Webpage and 'WW2 Combined Operations' Website.

How to cite this article: Antill, P. (6 April 2001), Operation Jubilee: The Disaster at Dieppe – Part 1: 19 August 1942, http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_dieppe1.html

WWII Home Page | WWII Subject Index | WWII Books | WWII Links | Day by Day

How to cite this article:Antill, P. (6 April 2001), Operation Jubilee: The Disaster at Dieppe – Part 1: 19 August 1942, http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_dieppe1.html

Help - F.A.Q. - Contact Us - Search - Recent - About Us -  Subscribe in a reader - Join our Google Group - Cookies